Source: The Up Coming (UK) - February 19, 2017
Return to Montauk
Q: Youíve presented films at Berlinale on quite a
few different occasions. How is the festival treating you this year?
SS: Oh, the usual. I was talking to a journalist earlier who said, So
itís time for the yearly Stellan SkarsgŚrd interview, with a tired
voice. But no, itís always so nice to come here.
Q: "Return to Montauk" is such a literary piece. Is it difficult to
play such a talky role, where so much relies on the dialogue?
SS: It was very difficult, because it goes against my principles. I
think words work well on stage, but in film you should avoid dialogue as
much as possible and see what you can do between the lines instead. This
film starts with a five minute monologue, and I said to Volker, this
could be the most expensive audio book ever, and he laughed. But on one
hand, I know that producers would be afraid to touch this material
because thereís so much literature. But on the other hand, people listen
to audio books for hours, and it doesnít hurt if thereís an image there
as well, just as long as you donít spoil the image by trying to
illustrate it or something. But as an actor it was really difficult to
do the first reading. What you had to do was do it as if you were
reading it from the book, so the rhythm and everything is decided by the
writing, and not by your emotions. You cannot illustrate, you canít put
a lot of feeling into it, you just have to say it and let the words do
the work. That makes it very hard to learn, because if it was a normal
monologue it would come out of emotions; I remember this, I was so sad
about that, or whatever. But you couldnít do that, so I had big problems
learning it. But it was important because you had to not cut any of the
language. Colm Tůibinís wonderful language is such a big part of the
film, so you had to find a way to bring it to life. Partly by leaving it
alone, and partly by giving it a subtle and beautiful life. But you also
have to make the audience believe that these people talk that way. I
mean, itís written, and nobody really talks like that.
Q: Max Zorn has somewhat of a wistful personality, always wanting to
examine his past. Can you identify with this?
No, but Iím a very different person to both Volker and Max Zorn. I know
a lot of people who go back and ask what did I do wrong, why am I not
happy, and so on. I am happy, so I donít have to do that. But I know
Iíve hurt people, Iíve made mistakes in my life, and make a note and I
file it, and I go on. I have the same relationship to the past as I do
with the future. I donít deal with it, because I live in the present.
But if youíre unhappy, you can do that. Itís a semi-philosophical but
literally very beautiful thought.
Q: Did not feeling all that comfortable with the character make him
more interesting to play?
SS: I donít feel comfortable playing anything. I find it extremely
painful every time, but I really try to find things that I havenít done
before, and especially finding films that havenít been made before, and
this is really hard. Most of the scripts you see, you say, OK, Iíve seen
that, and Iíve seen that, and Iíve seen that. They might change the
clothes or the professions of the characters, but itís the same f**king
film again and again. Lars Von Trier said something interesting to me
the other day. He said, ďOh Stellan, I know what kinds of films Iím
doing now.Ē And I said, OK, so what kind is it? He told me he was doing
the missing films. He wants to do the films that are missing in the
history of cinema. And I think thatís really good. Modest as always!